Thursday, March 18, 2010

Well, can you blame the guy?


After all, the American media has just spent the last three years trying to convince themselves and everyone else that Obama "is kind of ... God."

Interesting article at The Telegraph. "Barack Obama tries to find a scapegoat for his own hubris"

.
Perhaps Mr Obama's biggest political flaw is that he seems to view himself as the personification of virtue and right-thinking.

Bang. On.

Mr. Steyn:
Decline is a choice. The selfish pampered profligates of the postwar West made theirs, and for good measure and to ward off the day of reckoning consigned their kids and grandkids to it, too. It would seem to me unlikely that the next generation will be willing or so easily diverted by electronic novelties to reduce themselves to serfs in a vain attempt to sustain an unsustainable system. So something will happen: Greek riots? Total societal collapse? Best to keep the jetpack fuelled and ready. If you can find somewhere to go.

Gold is looking better and better all the time. But then again, you can't eat it.

.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

DOH and Kolya Witko have something in common

Actually, a lot in common. But we'll start with NOT having a crush on Sarah Polley. Of course, in the case of Mrs. Beazly and myself, we never did. Mr. Witko cites Polley's latest bit of goofy hypcrisy by linking to this story, and adds his own amusing take. (PG13 language warning).
So, I suppose Polley is saying that its okay for her to use corporate dollars to fund her films, but they shouldn't get any credit for it.

[...]



The most hilarious thing about Polley's actions are their likely results. By trumpeting her moral outrage and pissily yanking her name from the project, she ensures that far more people know of her involvement in it then otherwise would. Instead of simply being the director of a short film no one would have noticed, she is now the principled ex-director of a short film making headlines for the whiff of corporate greed wafting up. So, not only does the fact that she directed this film get far more publicity, she increases her standing among the moral heavyweights of the age.
Such as Al Gore, Bono, Oprah...
Don't ever get between a girl and her self-righteous delusions--especially with margarine.

.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Been so busy lately

...that I have not kept up with the inimitable Mr. Warren. Oh that everyone, from presidents to bishops, would heed his words:

For our governments [or dioceses] have created vast bureaucracies, employing immense numbers whose livelihoods depend entirely (whether they realize it or not) upon the capacity of profit-earning people to pay constantly increasing taxes.

[...]

The idea that we can spend our way out of a debt [or faith] crisis -- or what I called above, "Keynesianism gone nuts" -- has already been rejected by the Tea Party movement in the U.S., and has always been rejected by voters of conservative tendency. They know what's wrong with the present order, and have an important teaching function to the rest of the electorate, which doesn't get it yet.



But more urgently, we are in need of a positive conception of how to rebuild economy and society, when Nanny State collapses under her own weight. For yelling "run!" is only a short-term solution.
People of good will, it's time to take back the culture.

.

Be careful what you name your blog...

Because it will come back to bite you in the butt again and again. And that's all I'll say about my truly appalling stint on Coren, except for thanks to CTS Joanne (and all the staff at Edmonton studio) as well as Mike Z. for their help and support and the laughs we had. You guys and gals are great.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Just arrived home

From a fabulous weekend in Edmonton, where I attended the Western Canadian Catholic Homeschool Conference. Joseph Pearce was the keynote speaker. If you have never read this man's books, RUN, don't walk to the nearest book store or library and start requesting them. He is brilliant and very entertaining. If you ever get a chance to hear him speak, do take advantage of it.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Up with Pixar!

   Pixar's latest movie, "Up", came away with a couple of Oscars last Sunday night, one for Best Animated Feature and one for Best Original Score. Any praise of this film is well deserved - this is a great movie and Michael Giacchino's music (like the scores he wrote for "The Incredibles" and "Ratatouille") is magnificent.  It also received a nomination for Best Picture, but I wonder if its being an animated film was a disadvantage in that category. Brad Bird, creator and director of "The Incredibles", has pointed out that, much to his annoyance, animation is still regarded as a genre rather than as a medium through which stories of any genre may be told.  I understand that the Academy wants to recognize the great skill that goes into animation, but I don't think that animated films should be bundled off to their own category any more than, say, a film shot in black and white ought to be. Perhaps the category of "Best Animated Feature" should become a technical award for "Best Animation". If a film is good enough to be nominated for Best Animated Feature, it ought to be good enough to stand against all the other Best Picture nominees, as "Up" did.

 In any case, I am glad of Pixar's success. This is a company that knows how to make good films. They are truly family films, although I hate to use that term because it often brings to mind dull movies that range from sickly sweet to idiotically vulgar, or which are laced with unamusing double entendres (to keep us grownups entertained, of course). We can generally tell these wretched offerings by their trailers and have been lucky enough to steer clear of most of them, but when I see trailers for a feature like "G-Force", I always ask myself, "How bad were the ideas this producer turned down that day?"

  A good film (or book, or short story) is one that says something true, and does so in an engaging manner. "Up" is ostensibly a fantasy, but it has much to say about real life: our aspirations are not always realized, but the death of particular hopes does not have to mean the death of hope. A faithful marriage is indeed a great adventure. And talking dogs are FUNNY!!

 If you haven't already seen "Up", give it a whirl. You won't be sorry.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

On the Mark

Mark Shea has the culture of death's number in this post. Particularly disturbing is the article about child-sized condoms.

Whenever I read articles like this I have a little game I like to play. I first learned of this game from one of my brothers. Take the title and lyrics of any love song and substitute the word "fudge" for "love". For example, U2's "One"

One love
One life
When it's one need
In the night
One love
We get to share it
Leaves you baby if you
Don't care for it


becomes

One fudge
One life
(you can change that to 'knife' to make it even more fun!)
When it's one need
In the night
One fudge
We get to share it
Leaves you baby if you
Don't care for it


See how amusing that can be? Now try something similar with the article about the folks who are making condoms for 12 year olds and the lunatics who are applauding them. Instead of using the word "fudge", let's replace all references to sexual activity with references to smoking:

Extra light cigarettes for boys as young as 12 could soon be on our shelves. 

The Huffin'n'Puffin Funstix are going on sale in Switzerland after research found that not enough 12 to 14-year-old boys were paying attention to their nicotine ingestion.

The cigarettes are likely to end up on sale in Britain, said their manufacturer Screwtape Amusements Inc. A spokesman said the UK would be ‘top priority’ if the company expanded abroad, considering it had the highest teenage smoking rate in Europe. D. Wormwood said: ‘At the moment we are only producing the Funstix in Switzerland. ‘But the UK is certainly a very attractive market since there is a very high rate of underage smoking.’ 


A standard cigarette has a nicotine content of 1.0 to 2.1 milligrams in comparison with the Funstix's 0.75 milligrams. Both are the same length – 190mm.

According to a study of 13 to 20-year-olds, a quarter said that a standard cigarette was too tarry.
B. Eezlebub, of teenage smokers' rights group Straight Talking Puffer Education, said: ‘We know young people are smoking and if this is what it takes to protect them, we need to go along with it.’

How far do you think that would fly?

Monday, March 8, 2010

What he said goes double double for me.

I got a chuckle from this letter which appeared in Mark Steyn's mailbox this week. Fellow Canadian  Mike writes:

NO FREE LUNCH (OR COFFEE)

McDonalds is offering free coffee for two weeks to fight Tim Hortons up here in Canada, Mark, and as you might expect, while the coffee is free, there’s a 20 minute wait for it. So this morning as I was trying to get my McMuffin combo, I inquired whether there was a shorter line for people buying food or if I could pay for a "quick" coffee. I was greeted then with the traditional Canadian refrain: "NO TWO-TIER [COFFEE].” I fled the restaurant before the CBC arrived with the tar and feathers… although a bit of that tar with some hot water would have been nice with my McMuffin.
So please: Alert the ObamaCare fence-sitters about the costs of “free” stuff. 

I encountered a sadder example of the cost of "free" stuff a couple of weeks ago at my son's bowling tournament. I overheard another parent (a man who appeared to be in his late forties or early fifties) telling a friend that he was in need of a knee replacement but was deemed too young to receive one. He was lamenting the fact that, by the time he's old enough to get on the waiting list, his kids will be grown - it will be too late to do the things he wants to do with them now, but can't because of his bad knee. (This is a perfect example of how government annexation of health care is tantamount to the state taking ownership of your body, a topic upon which Mr. Steyn has often commented.)

  Perhaps this man will choose to go to the United States to have his knee replaced, if he can afford it. He didn't seem to be a famous politician or an NHL player, so if he wants the health care he has already paid for with his tax dollars, he will most likely end up waiting to get on a waiting list for it. But hey, at least that new knee will be "free"... providing he gets to the top of the list before he dies or before the bureaucrats doling out the knee replacements decide he has become too old to be knee-worthy. Maybe we should all be put on waiting lists when we turn 40 in order to maximize the possibility that our free knees (or hips, or whatever) will be offered to us when we actually need them. Of course, if they're installed only months before we succumb to old age, they can always be recycled, like dentures sometimes are.

Friday, March 5, 2010

You can have my iPod (and my cross rib roast) ...

when you pry them from my cold, dead hands. A great piece by Brian Lilley at MercatorNet, re: mandatory mortifications (a.k.a. carbon fasts) in homage to Gaia via the Climate Change Church of Settled Science.

Whereas the Church suggests that you lay off the cheeseburgers on Friday and not covet your neighbour's flat screen TV as part of your plan for eternal salvation, the environmental movement proposes to tax both the burger and the flat screen and force McDonald's to sell falafels on Mondays all in the name of carbon emissions. The old saying is that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, but some days I think the greens missed that lesson, and, assuming that honey was oppressive to both bees and flies, decided to force feed us a good dose of vinegar.

After years of trying to scare us with imminent doom, I think it is time for a rest.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

We are defined by giant inflatable beavers.

At the opening ceremonies of the Vancouver Olympics we learned that "some say what defines us
is something as simple as please and thank you". Now, apparently, the powers that be have changed their minds:



I have no convincing proof of my own prescience, since this was only printed in a gag newspaper that exactly three other people read, but here is my 2006 prediction for the Vancouver games:

The Turin closing ceremonies are going to be a tough act to follow, and in order to be up to the challenge Olympic organizers are even now embarking on a strict regime of hallucinogenic drugs and wine coolers in order to come up with the best possible ideas for the grand opening ceremonies.  Ottawa's own prolific composer Willem Fronk is composing the Olympic theme, "We're Just Glad to be at the Olympics", to which children dressed as beavers will dance around a moose dressed as a pack of bacon.

I wish I'd put money on this.



Loo, loo; vind to my loo!

(Alternate title: No, I’m just here for the naan.)
I’ve been mulling (or perhaps chewing) over this story ever since Mark Steyn posted a link to it in his sidebar a wee bit back.

Aussies urged to vindaloo against violence

Melburnians have always been known as foodies, but now they have a new reason to eat out.


Fed up [heh] with violence and the bad wrap [sic—or was it meant as a friendly non-racist ethnic flatbread pun?] her city was receiving, Mia Northrop decided to embrace Melbourne's love of food in a show of support for the Indian and migrant community.


On February 24, she is encouraging people all over Australia to take part in Vindaloo Against Violence.


Ms Northrop, who works as a digital media designer, says the idea is simple.


"The idea is that you just go to your local Indian restaurant and just dine on Indian food as a way of embracing the Indian community," she said.

As opposed to just going to your local Indian restaurant and just dining on Indian food because you are just hungry or just like the taste.

And anyway, how would anyone know? Diners were urged to register online for the event, but does it stop there? Do you wear your heart on your sleeve and announce your racism-free attitude when you come in the door of the eatery (thus embarrassing—or perhaps annoying—the proprietors, as in, "Hello there! Some of my best friends are folks like you!"), or do you say nothing and allow them to think that it’s just a good business day?

I know this event has passed, but it got me wondering about something: while the Melburnian “foodies” (what is a foodie, anyway? In my day, they were called gluttons, but no matter) were bending over backward trying to show the local “migrant communities” how totally non-racist they were, was anyone vetting the eating establishments themselves to find out if they were racism-free zones? You wouldn’t want to support racism in any way, would you? Even if it was exceptionally tasty?

Were the migrant-community restaurant owners interviewed as to their political, racial and religious views? Where they asked if they harboured hatred or prejudice or dislike against any identifiable groups? Were Hindu restaurateurs asked for their views on Sikhs or Muslims? Were Muslim eatery-owners asked if they hated Jews or other assorted infidels? Were Indian Christian (yes, there are some) restaurant-owners asked if they disliked gays or atheists?

And if so, were those establishments singled out and/or boycotted by the totally non-racist Vindaloo Against Violence Foodies? If not, why not?

Put in a slightly different setting, if you lived in the Southern U.S. and you knew that a really great steakhouse was owned and operated by a good old boy with old timey religion KKK sympathies, would you refuse to patronize his establishment? Or would you “Prime Rib Against Prejudice” in order to show him how tolerant you are of diversity?

Well, no, that’s different, the Vindaloo Against Violence Foodies would say. And as soon as they figure out how, they’ll let you know, but right now, that fragrant rogan josh and butter chicken are just too… distracting…. buttery… chicken…. korma… mmm….

In the meantime, the takeaway lesson is that when it comes to being totally non-racist, the policy is Tell, but Don’t Ask. And that it’s OK (praiseworthy, even) to patronize the business of someone who may hate your western culture and might even want you dead, because that’s what multiculturalism is all about.

And besides, the naan is free with the buffet.




Postscript: because this is Canada, and the word “racism” probably already has us flagged at the CHRC, allow me to state that I really like vindaloo.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Global warming doesn't kill people: stupidity kills people.

Baby survives parents' global warming suicide pact.

They succeeded in murdering their toddler son. Really, really sad. Link found at SDA.

Leraar draagt hoofddoek als protest

I couldn't have said it better myself. Or, as Mark Steyn translates:

To protest the Islamophobia of Geert Wilders, a male teacher from Eindhoven has taken to wearing a Muslim headscarf in public.


Look, I like a neat visual shorthand as much as the next fellow, but this is almost too perfect a symbol of what's happening on the Continent: European men are auditioning for the part of Muslim women.
So... men wearing Islamic women's clothing: is that where the "draagt" part comes in?

Too funny.

David Warren's dream hockey team:


We'd try to represent every possible skin colour and shading, all major non-European language groups, the least probable national origins, some interesting religious affiliations, the widest possible range of body weights and ages, a selection of common physical disabilities, and as many sexual orientations as we were able to identify through diligent research -- all to be included through combinations of faculties, or absence of faculties, to the exclusion only of white heterosexual males.
Maybe they could have "CHRC" emblazoned across their jerseys (since CCCP has already been used).

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Scaramouche!: We're Number One!

Further to my post yesterday about the Olympics...

Scaramouche!: We're Number One! Canada wins some other prizes too, like being the country with the most stupid human rights commissions.

As for gold medals,  Paul Tuns points out (by linking to this article in the Edmonton Journal) that everything is relative: Canada won more gold (partly) because there were more gold to win. (88 events at this Olympics, as opposed to as few as 37 in 1976).

Al Gore: obtuse liar, comedian.

A silly op-ed on nytimes.com

We would no longer have to worry that our grandchildren would one day look back on us as a criminal generation that had selfishly and blithely ignored clear warnings that their fate was in our hands.

Um...like future (even more grossly overtaxed) generations will blame Boomers for killing off entire generations by contraception and abortion?

I, for one, genuinely wish that the climate crisis were an illusion.

Lie. He has made millions (if not billions) off the fantasy of global warming and the resulting hysteria.

The heavy snowfalls this month have been used as fodder for ridicule by those who argue that global warming is a myth, yet scientists have long pointed out that warmer global temperatures have been increasing the rate of evaporation from the oceans, putting significantly more moisture into the atmosphere — thus causing heavier downfalls of both rain and snow in particular regions, including the Northeastern United States. Just as it’s important not to miss the forest for the trees, neither should we miss the climate for the snowstorm.

Translation: Watch my swinging hockey stick! You are getting sleeeeepy! Global WARMING causes lots and lots of SNOW! When you awake you will remember nothing...

Thanks to Mark Shea for the link.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Did it enjoy a leisurely cigarette too?

"Canada wakes up after Games climax at ease with itself."

 Whatever.

Sure, the Games (and the last hockey match in particular) were exciting. Sure, I watched it all on TV. Sure, I'm glad all over that Canada won so many gold medals. But I have no illusions about this changing the country "forever." What twaddle.
If Canada can't have lasting national pride (and it doesn't) in having helped the Allies win World War II, then hosting a winter games and garnering a bucketful of medals isn't going to have any long-term impact.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Why American foreign policy matters to us ALL

The Steyn:
It's a mistake to think the infantilization of once-free peoples represented by the micro-regulatory nanny state can be confined to pancakes and hot tubs.

And more from David Warren:

So we now have a double mystery: an extremely dangerous regime in Iran doing we know not what, and standing against it, an American president who does not know what he is doing.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Bandages and penicillin, not condoms

Sadly, the West just doesn't get it. Ever.

The flow of medical supplies waiting to be distributed to tens of thousands of earthquake victims in Haiti was delayed for weeks by a massive supply of condoms dominating the space of the main storage facility...
[...]
shipping containers of medical supplies were unable to be unloaded, sorted and distributed since an enormous supply of condoms clogged the facility till early February, when the condoms could be removed. The condoms were estimated to take up about 70% of the space in the 17,000 sq. ft. warehouse.


And it's not just Haiti:

When Canadian General Romeo Dallaire returned from Rwanda in the aftermath of the Rwandan Massacre he noted in a 1996 speech that military personnel referred to UN and other foreign aid as "covering the country with rubber."



Dallaire explained that tons of condoms and other contraceptives were being shipped to and distributed around the region in quantities far beyond what the population could use and in place of much more needed food, medicine and other critically needed aid. Medicine stores, he said, were filled with contraceptives and extremely short of any supplies to treat wounded Rwandans.
At least the condoms don't go to waste, however, which should make WHO, Planned Parenthood International and their ilk extremely glad:

With business-savy ingenuity some in the developing world have turned the condom dumping by the West to their advantage. The BBC reported in 2004 that in one Indian city alone 600,000 condoms a day were used in the sari-weaving industry. Sari weavers use the lubrication in the condoms to soften the loom's shuttle making weaving faster, without risking stains to the silk.
LifeSite News

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Mr. Steyn on the Geert Wilders trial

"When the law stands in explicit opposition to the truth, freeborn peoples should stand in opposition to the law."

article here

"This could become a human rights issue if you're not careful...."

  The above is a telling quote from this news story about the dispute over front-of-the-city-bus territory. This issue has NOTHING to do with human rights, but it does illustrate how "human rights" commissions have become a means of  threatening or actually taking  revenge on those who have offended or merely inconvenienced you:

"I feel there's discrimination against one group of people and that this could become a human rights issue if you're not careful," said Daiva Greenridge, a local resident who often uses the transit system with her young daughter.
  Reading those words induces the same feelings of despair as the comment from the thin-skinned reader I quoted in my last post, but after this story I found at least one comment that is much more heartening. "Fencerdad" hits the nail on the head when he writes:


I'm a parent who regularly rides the bus with my son in a stroller. When I see a handicapped person get on I'll have the stroller folded before the ramp is lowered to the sidewalk. This is, from my experience, what nearly everyone would do--and if they don't, the driver will intervene and ask that parent to move.

This is common courtesy and common sense. Once in a while, you'll come across someone who doesn't have either of those things. The problem with legislating basic social behaviour is that people will do nothing _but_ follow laws, and quit actually being courteous to one another.

This sort of law won't fix anyone's bad behaviour, but it will make other people resentful and less inclined to help anyone. The few people who would be targeted by this proposed rules won't change anyways--they'll grumble, complain, refuse to move, get tossed off the bus, fined, and file a civil lawsuit that will be thrown out of court. How does that help anyone?

Basically, we need to quit dividing people with laws, and (re?)learn to get along with each other. Yes, there will always be a few bad apples. Yes, we need laws for severe crimes. We don't, however, need endless petty laws for endless petty squabbles with jerks.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

What took you so long?

I was wondering how many seconds would pass before someone ferreted out the racist undertones in this story:

Dark-skinned immigrants urged to take vitamin D

I only had to scroll down to the fifth comment:

I'm wondering if this advice is also meant for dark-skinned people who are not immigrants, but are Canadian born? My parents immigrated to this country from South Asia more than 40 years ago, but i was born here. So, either, my vitamin D levels are not affected with the same problem because my skin is used to this climate, OR, the researchers of this study can't conceive that dark skinned people can actually be born here, and that we're called Canadians and everything!?
There's absolutely nothing wrong with being an immigrant, obviously, but it feels like the journalist or researchers are forgetting that there are a whole lot of brown people who were born here, so they might want to address that in their limitations to their study, that: a) did not study dark skinned people who were born here, therefore don't have specific results of that group; b) didn't decipher between dark skinned immigrants and dark-skinned Canadian born (who's origin is of South-Asian descent), resulting in no control group or lack of list of differences/similarities; OR c) Just didn't bother about using the right language, resulting in coming off as thoughtless and, let's be honest, a little bit racist.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Childhood obesity is caused by parental obesity and/or apathy

A short article I wrote for MercatorNet.

Here is an uncut, politically-incorrect version:

President Obama may be wishing he had never started the tortuous debate on health care reform, but his wife seems to have hit on a winning issue with her Let’s Move! program to combat childhood obesity. After all, who could oppose an initiative to address one of the most distressing health issues of the times?

Obesity is constantly in the news: you can’t watch TV or read a paper, magazine or website without seeing an obesity-related headline, human interest story, or those ubiquitous ads for diet tips. Moreover, what has long been a Western phenomenon is rapidly going global. A recent cover story for Readers’ Digest (Canadian edition) declares, on the authority of the World Health Organization, that the world has reached a disturbing “tipping point”: for the first time in history, more people on this planet are dying from overeating than of starvation.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

A Valentine Card Addressed to the Human Rights Commissions

      I see that the balrog which is the Canadian Human Rights Commission  is rumbling  again deep within the bowels of our government bureaucracy. What perfect timing! Valentine's Day is almost here, and as an organization that is committed to eradicating hate, the CHRC has surely planned its latest head-rearing to fall near  this day meant for lovers. Maybe they have taken to heart this nugget from Rex Murphy : "Not every article in every magazine or newspaper is meant to be a Valentine card addressed to every reader's self esteem," and they intend to do something about it.

      After thirty-odd years of HRCs toiling away to make us all be nicer to each other, I just cannot understand why everything you read, hear and see is not  like a candy heart from your sweetie. Rather than focusing solely on stamping out hatred,  I suggest the HRCs also mount a proactive campaign to foster a great, big bumper crop of Canadian love. We could all use more warm fuzzies, good vibes and happy feelings in our interactions with other human beings, don't you think? Perhaps they could create an entirely new government body and call it the "Warm Tingly Fuzzies Commission".  It would be an excellent follow up/companion bureaucracy to the HRCs. After hatred and unpopular opinions are forever rooted out of human minds and hearts, (and who better than members of a plodding bureaucracy to complete that task?) the WTFC could step up to help in those awkward moments when we can't quite express our super niceness. You'd just have to shake your head three times, say, "WTF...?" and they'd be there. Kind of like a verbal Bat Signal.  After all, who hasn't been lost for words, especially when faced with someone who might take offence at yours?

    Just imagine that you have hurt someone with something you wrote. You may not know the person or even have a clue exactly what the harmful words were, but you know that warm fuzziness levels between you and your offended one are dangerously low, because your HRC has told you so! What is your next step? You've already done everything the HRC asked. You've wiped your blog off the internet or used your final newspaper column to recant. You've ceased communicating about the banned subject in private emails and you've sent off a check wrapped in a forced apology. You may even have given up your job or small business to show how full of love you are. Yet for some reason, you still don't feel any better. You're standing there like a non-hate-struck teenager, casting shy glances at the person who has drained away the last three, five or ten years of your life and wondering how you can make it up to him. That's where the WTFC gives you the right words, and you start singing their tune. You don't have to be Judy Garland. Just sing it with feeling....

They Made Me Love You

Dear HRC Plaintiff, I am singing this to you
And I hope that to my tone you won't object;
My heart beats like a hammer
Please don't throw me in the slammer
From now on all my thoughts will be correct.
I guess I'm just another hatemonger
From now on I'll be more circumspect.


They made me love you!
I didn't want to do it; HRC forced me to it,
They made me love you,
And all the time you knew it, you complained so that they'd do it.


My opinions, dear, made you feel quite pained,
The HRC refuted them: "Shut up," they have explained.
They made me sigh 'cause
I didn't want to tell you,
(Turns out they can compel you)
I think four grand, from me to you, ought to do, free speech eschew, 'deed I do!
I must tell you what I'm thinking
The very mention of your name sends me o'er eggshells slinking!
You know they made me love you!


I don't care what happens,
Let the whole world end, 
I'll never write or say or think something that might offend
'Cause you know they made me love you!



Happy Valentine's Day, everybody!


 

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Good heavens, who wrote this, Monty Python?

Yahoo news article about Michelle Obama trying to stamp out childhood obesity.

The swelling obesity rate in the United States has also seen medical costs associated with excessive weight balloon from around 78 billion dollars a year in 1998 to around 147 billion dollars annually in 2006, a study released last year showed.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

I am blown away by the idiocy of the president of NOW

Pro-abort feminists: not desperate --or ridiculous-- enough.

LifeSite News dishes on the aftermath of the Tim Tebow ad, in which the football player playfully tackles his mom.

The president of NOW, one of the leading forces urging CBS to remove the ad, responded by condemning the ad's “celebration” of violence against women, in a reference to Tim’s tackling of his mom.


"I am blown away at the celebration of the violence against women in it," said NOW's Terry O'Neill...
Pro-life blogger Dr. Gerard Nadal says:
[...]  the ad's great success lay in focusing attention on the pro-abortion lobby's reaction to a simple celebration of life.



"Focus on the Family are expert fisherman, and you Big Mouth Bass took the bait," said Nadal in an open letter to Planned Parenthood and NOW.


"You allowed yourselves to be exposed for just who and what you are: Haters of motherhood, fatherhood, family and babies."

Monday, February 8, 2010

Global Warming...

BRING IT ON!!! It's a balmy - 30 degrees C in my neck of the woods this morning.

Thanks, Fr. Andrew, for letting me borrow this picture! You can see the rest of his frosty shots here.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

The wise Mr. Warren on climate change

Like communist apparatchiks in the good old days, a global warm-alarmist may "honestly" think he is serving a higher purpose, that he is on "the right side of history," that he must cut a few corners for the greater good, that the end will eventually justify the means. Read Dostoevsky on this. The book is Crime and Punishment, and the character is Raskolnikov. By subtle increments a failure of candour degenerates into major-league crime.



Not only all the numbers, but all the assumptions behind "AGW" -- not "most," but all -- have depended on the manipulation of facts by persons who had an interest in manipulating them. Often the specific incident is small, but the falsehood is cumulative. Investment in the illusion grows, the stakes become too large to forfeit. Yet the reality remains: that we still don't know any more about long-term human influence on climate than Punxsutawney Phil can know by observing his own shadow.


This should have been obvious to climatologists from the beginning. At the simplest level, they could observe that global temperature estimates depended on a slur of constantly changing thermometer locations and time sequences. NASA's recent admissions are the more pathetic for that reason: from the top down, these were men who should have known better than to think they could fly beyond the end of such a limb.




I have argued previously for chastity: not limited to the sexual sense, of keeping one's pants on. The virtue of chastity requires us to look at the world without immediately engaging our desires. Those desires are often not sexual at all; some of the most powerful involve justifying one's livelihood. A scientist with an interest in getting a result is under huge temptation, compounded by the huge public funding on which his research depends.


Our mysterious capacity for chastity can put us above the animal level: for if we try, we can actually remove the blinkers of, "What's in it for me?" -- and discover truths larger than ourselves. The highest arts and sciences require alike the highest conditions of chastity. It is what lifts us above the groundhogs.
No, I have not cut and pasted the whole thing. Do read it all.
 
 
 
 
 

From our Beyond Satire files...

Victorian (as in the Australian state) Premier creates new government post:

It is something straight out of a George Orwell novel: the Victorian government has appointed a member of parliament to become “Minister for Respect”.

Why didn't the Canadian Human Rights Commission think of that?

I would like to suggest a new title for the Victorian premier: The Wizard of Oz. It will certainly require magical powers to achieve universal, mutual respect.


How does that tune go again?

Tum-te-da,
Something or other.
...if I only had a brain...

Full article here by  Bill Muehlenberg (MercatorNet)

Cowardly pro-abort feminists need men to speak for them

This ad features two MEN speaking on behalf of Planned Parenthood. It's in response to the much-hyped Tim Tebow ad (which will air during the Super Bowl).



Especially rich is this quotation:
"I want my daughters to live in a world where everyone's decisions are respected," adds Joyner.

REALLY?

EVERYONE'S decisions?

Even the "decisions" of moms (and dads) who endorse/practice things like female genital mutilation, forced marriage, honour killing, suicide bombing?

When is pro-choice, feminist America going to address that particular elephant in the room? Nah, it's much easier to pick on Tim Tebow, his mom, and those nameless, faceless, defenseless products of conception.

 Some decisions are great, some are good, some are bad, some are stupid, and some are evil.

 It's not about honouring people's decisions; it's about honouring human life and the dignity of the person.

Abortion kills.

Sheila Liaugminas at MercatorNet neatly sums up what pro-aborts are all about:

the "choice" movement is not truly about giving women one

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Bold move by Canadian bishops

They recently (January 26, 2010) issued a Pastoral Letter on Human Trafficking. Why, you may ask? To coincide with that great threat to human life and dignity... the Winter Olympics.

The tie-in is just a little implausible. Sure, the CCCB is gravely concerned (who isn't?) about the whole increased prostitution thing--it's evil and horrid. But then so is EVERY OTHER DAY in this post-mod country/continent, with its rampant violence, domestic abuse, child abuse and molestation, prostitution, human trafficking, pornography, strip clubs, lap dancing, abortion, exploitation of immigrants and of vulnerable women and children. These evils have existed in Canada forever. Why the statement now?

My bad.

I have always maintained that the Climate Change Church of Settled Science is a religion. But actually, it's a cult.


A lot of environmentalists think they need to convince people that the way they live their lives is wrong," she adds. "They want us to stop sinning so they try to scare us into conversion with predictions of high-carbon hell. But it's not an effective message.
"We need to start selling people a vision of low-carbon heaven," Ms Townsend argues.
 [...]
For Palmer, who is a United Nations adviser on climate change and religion, the green movement's appropriation of religious language and imagery has backfired.

"Environmentalists have stolen fear, guilt and sin from religion, but they have left behind celebration, hope and redemption," he says.

That's because there IS no redemption, Mr. Palmer, much less celebration and hope. What's to celebrate about the notion of a bunch of enviro-nazis (or commies) micro-managing every moment of your indoor-plumbing-is-evil, electricity-free, vegetarian existence?

And am I the only one freaked out that the UN has an "adviser on climate change and religion"? That is just weird. I also think it very odd that they chose to use a picture of a crucifix (Christ) to illustrate this article. Shouldn't they have had some more appropriate symbol, like Mother Nature spiked to an oil well?

Hell's Bells!

Who'd have thought that AC/DC would be closer to Christian teaching on true charity than the goody-blue-shades Bono?

Johnson, the gravel-voiced British singer of Australia’s biggest rock band, has joined a growing group of critics of Geldof and the U2 singer over their very public charity work, saying they should stop lecturing audiences about charity work and instead do their good deeds in private. [...]

He then offered some words of advice to his fellow rockers: “I’m sorry mate, do it yourself, spend some of your own money and get it done.

Story link from Steynonline.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

From the "Mouths of Babes" file...

My ten-year-old was working on a Language Arts writing assignment today. She was supposed to take two shorter sentences and, using a conjunction or omitting words, edit them down to one, more succinct sentence. Here are the two sentences:

Many men have learned to cope with handicaps. Many women have learned to cope with handicaps.

The correct answer is: Many men and women have learned to cope with handicaps.

My daughter (who evidently knows her parents all too well) wrote:

"Many men have learned to cope with handicaps, and women."

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Heh heh. "Feminist logic" is an oxymoron

Who'd have thought?!

It's a case study in the conundrum of liberal ideology: radical feminist groups declaring that a woman's choice to not have an abortion is, somehow, anti-choice.
David N. Bass at The American Spectator discusses the mental gymnastics required by pro-choicers who are anti-choice when it comes to Tim Tebow's mom's choice.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, makes the valid point that feminists' worst-case scenario for the ad is that women "are exposed to an example of sacrifice for the sake of an unborn child."



Shocking, I know, especially when viewers could be watching naked women in the shower or a woman exposing her endowments during a congressional hearing.


It's a wonder anyone takes feminists seriously when their hypocrisy is so manifold.

J.D. Salinger is dead

I guess I missed the memo. David Warren discusses Salinger's seminal work Catcher in the Rye.  (I'm pretty sure I had to read it in high school too, but I don't remember a thing about it. That's how memorable it was.)
...a novel which exalts the worst kind of self-pitying adolescent narcissism, and holds it up as an ideal, through adulthood to a senile old age.
When I read those lines, I thought, 'Surely Mr. Warren will, at some point in this essay, mention the very person whom this description calls to mind.' I was not disappointed.
Indeed, one cannot look through the list of President Obama's strange and demented policy czars without spotting so many Holden Caulfields, nor escape their ever-presence among the talking heads of MSNBC. And in watching the president's State of the Union address this week, I had the distinct impression of a man whose big-government vision rests less in Marxism than in the faux-naïf of "a catcher in the rye."
for any who would like to brush up on Catcher, here is Larry Thornberry's take on the novel. (American Spectator)
While it's easy to see why adolescents, particularly of the indulged sort, would find this kind of thing attractive. It's more of a mystery why grownups, some disguised as teachers and lit professors, praise this nonsense and oblige high school and college students to read it. This is almost child abuse. [...]
No one over the weekend would come out and say it, so allow me to. This literary emperor is wearing no clothes. His only novel and its chief character are contemptible.

Pray blow that wind north.

Amen, brother.

David Warren discusses the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding election spending:

There are many and huge ramifications, but the chief one is that the decision attacks the contemporary lobbying system. In effect, those advancing special interests are condemned to lobbying the entire electorate, instead of just lobbying the politicians behind closed doors. This directly undermines the political class. It goes to the heart of their ability to broker deals not in the public interest, and pass them into law without public debate.


And that in turn is why the response to the decision from the political class has been unfriendly to the edge of berserk. They correctly understand that "politics as usual" is now under review, actually and not rhetorically.

Monday, February 1, 2010

And speaking of brilliant

Here is Mark Steyn telling us why Obama in particular (and bureacracy in general) rots:


 Simply as a matter of internal logic, this is somewhat perplexing. After all, when he isn't blaming George W. Bush, Obama blames "Washington" – a Washington mired in "partisanship" and "pettiness" and "the same tired battles" and "Washington gimmicks" that do nothing but ensure that our "problems have grown worse." Washington, Obama tells us, is "unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems."
So let's have more Washington! In our schools, in our hospitals, in our cars, in everything!
Which raises the question: Does even Obama listen to Obama's speeches?
[...]
Like most lifelong politicians, Barack Obama has never created, manufactured or marketed any product other than himself. So, quite reasonably, he sees government dependency as the natural order of things.
And in his college-loan plan he's explicitly telling you: If you start a business, invent something, provide a service, you're a schmuck and a loser. In the America he's building, you'll be working 24/7 till you drop dead to fund an ever-swollen bureaucracy that takes six weeks off a year and retires at 53 on a pension you could never dream of. Obama's proposals are bold only insofar as few men would offer such a transparent guarantee of disaster: It's the audacity of hopelessness.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Brilliant.

David Warren's State of the Union address:

Debt is not the answer to economic problems, there or here; more bureaucracy is not the answer; nor is the further empowerment of public sector unions to hold taxpayers to ransom.

And as to terrorism and foreign threats, Mr. Brown was able to play, before the most politically correct constituency in the U.S., variations on the theme: "American taxpayer dollars should go to buying weapons to kill terrorists, not pay for lawyers to defend them."


Hallelujah! ... And don't thank Martha Coakley for throwing that election; the polls show indisputably it is Obama we must thank. By "pushing his envelope" an inch too far, he has accomplished what took George III far more effort.

Be still, my churning stomach

I did not even read this story on Yahoo News, because frankly, the title is enough.

"Quincy Jones is ready to redo charity song 'We Are the World' to benefit Haiti quake recovery" (The Canadian Press)
For your penance, you will re-read David Warren's essay "Generous to a fault."

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Dolphins are people too.

At least, some humans wish they were. They believe that dolphins ought to be endowed with "non-human personhood" status. Margaret Somerville discusses (MercatorNet): 

The refusal of the courts to recognize unborn babies as persons, in order to allow abortion, shows the protective effect of the concept of personhood and that, unless expressly excluded, all human beings are persons. Currently, we also use the word person to distinguish humans from animals, in order to establish that every human deserves "special respect" as compared with animals.
As for me, I wish society would confer legal status upon our current "human non-persons" (the unborn).
We used to regard humans as special on the basis that they had a soul, a Divine spark, and animals did not. Far from everyone accepts that today. But most people at least act as though we humans have a "human spirit," a metaphysical, although not necessarily supernatural, element as part of the essence of our humanness. The beautiful Sanskrit farewell, loosely translated, "The Light in me recognizes the Light in you," captures this reality. 
[...]

We must have greater respect for all life, and I would add to that, in particular, human life. Restricting personhood to humans is one way we recognize and implement the latter.


Thanks to Dave for the heads-up on this story.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Obama explains Scott Brown's win in Massachusetts

"The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office…. People are angry and they're frustrated, not just because of what's happened in the last year or two years but what's happened over the last eight years."


Moral 1: It’s all about me.

Moral 2: Everything always was and always will be George W. Bush’s fault.

As Mark Steyn says: Presumably, the president isn't stupid enough actually to believe what he said. But it's dispiriting to discover he's stupid enough to think we're stupid enough to believe it.

The poor you will always have with you...

First-world guilt, not so much. Televised pseudo-compassion is useless (as Right Girl points out, who cared about Haiti before the quake hit?).

Haiti was totally dysfunctional before the quake. I'm pretty sure that $50 (or $500 or $5 million, if I had it) won't get rid of their useless corrupt leaders or social structures. Haiti needs a miracle. Not sure what the answer is; pretty sure the Crying-on-TV-Live-Aid junk is not it. David Warren explains.

The impulse to "write a cheque" to assuage conscience becomes more and more deeply engrained in our psyches, as we abandon the moral and spiritual underpinnings of our civilization, and indulge the habit of quantifying each issue by the amount of money we throw at it. My advice to the people who have asked me what they can most usefully do to help is, start thinking ahead to the next disaster. For Port-au-Prince is already bottlenecked with supplies.



Love is not a declaration, but instead an action, and those who are troubled by the hideous conditions in which so many on our planet live and die had better devote more time than is required by PayPal.

A hard and unwelcome truth (to those who want the charitable equivalent of instant gratification) is the limit on the amount of money that can be usefully spent on a disaster, before counter-productive efforts begin to dominate all spending. By counter-productive I mean, especially, in a case like Haiti, restoring the circumstances that keep its people in desperation, including the power of a kleptocracy to create political obstacles to any direct human enterprise -- whether profitable or charitable.


Do keep reading.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

As we prepare for another week of home schooling...

...here is one of the many reasons why we have chosen this path. The state has no clue about what kind of knowledge children need in order to live fruitful lives.

Steyn: nailing it as usual.

We are making Islam the de facto established church of the western world.

from The Corner.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

This Week's Topic: How to Repair a Dishwasher

 Mr. Beazly insists that we need a new dishwasher. I insist that our current dishwasher works perfectly fine, except for the cup and a half of water that leaks out the bottom every time we use it. (That's what God gave us towels for, right?)

 Whether we repair this dishwasher or buy a new one, we're going to be spending a lot of money. The two appliance repair shops I called want sixty bucks up front and then  15 - 17 dollars PER QUARTER HOUR for their time. We are always being scolded by the enviro-nannies for throwing too many things away, but is it any wonder no one repairs anything when it costs ten times what the appliance is worth just to have someone come and look at it?  Add onto that the cost for parts, if they still even make them for our ten year old dishwasher. I quickly ruled out professional help, although I may need some of a psychological nature since my next course of action was to see if I could fix it myself.

I took the front panel off the dishwasher, because that was what the interweb told me to do. As I lay on the floor looking at all the wires and hoses I was reminded of that Jerry Seinfeld bit where he ponders why he ever attempts to fix things that break. "When I open this thing up, what am I expecting to see that I could possibly fix?" Jerry wonders. "A snowman with his hat off?"

Well, that's what I'm always expecting to see. Consequently, my house is full of broken small appliances with their panels missing. Anyway, after watching for the spot where the water was coming out as the dishwasher ran, and then doing a bunch of internet research, I now have some quick and easy steps to help you, dear reader, through your very own dishwasher repair, should you ever need to perform one.

Step 1: Open up the front panel, as discussed above.
Step 2: Look for the part of the mechanism that is causing trouble. If it looks like this (see Figure A):




you are home free. Effect the needed repair as per Figure B:

 Be prepared, however, for the following possibilities:
a) The hat might be damaged.
b) A new hat might cost $300.
c) The snowman might need a new head.

In that case, proceed to

Step 3: Admit that your husband is right and get ready to go out shopping for a new dishwasher.





Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Well THIS shows total class, to say nothing of compassion.

"Planned Parenthood Capitalizing on Haiti Earthquake with New Fundraiser." Courtesy LifeSite News.


“While millions of people are suffering unbelievably and are without the most basic necessities, Planned Parenthood wants to grab the donations that should be going to provide medical care, food, clothing, and housing, and funnel it to its local affiliate that pushes condoms on children as young as 10 years old,” she continued.

I guess as far as IPP is concerned, not enough Haitians are dead.

Today the Lord shall deliver you into my hand; I will strike you down.

No, I'm not planning to kill anyone. Just trying to get a grip on my personal demons: be a better mom, get organized, lose some weight, that sort of thing. To that end, the Dumb Old Housewives highly recommend this online bible study magazine  (available in print version too).


God wants us to learn the combination of faith and action that David showed, that balance between his grace and our work that will give us victory every time. [...]
How often do we rely too much on God and neglect the work that he calls us to do, whether in evangelization or in our own growth in holiness? And how often do we rely on our own strength, doing the “work of the Lord” but neglecting the “Lord of the work”? Both approaches are fraught with danger. The first one can leave us feeling fruitless and frustrated. The second one can leave us full of ourselves or worn out and dispirited. But the middle way—the way of cooperation between divine grace and human work—brings not only fruitfulness but refreshment and joy as well.
Entire meditation here.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Well this would explain...

Why my crappy Acer laptop is crapping out on me after just two years. (And it was a warranty replacement machine for an even crappier one that was fatally flawed from the beginning.)

Laptops’ average lifespan less than four years, study finds

"With an expected malfunction rate of over 23 percent, Gateway and Acer were almost as unreliable as HP, according to the study."

Remind me to by a Mac book next time.

This is just plain funny.

And pointless. Sometimes life is like that. But who knew that pigs had free will?

Pack of wild pigs shut down Germany's autobahn.


Germany's DAPD news agency says the autobahn was reopened after three hours when it was believed that the pigs had left on their own accord.

Or maybe they hijacked a Honda.


  

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

This title caught my attention.

UK Party Leader Says Faith Schools Must Teach Homosexuality is "Normal and Harmless"

courtesy LifeSite News.

My first response: that particular UK Party Leader is totally hateful and homophobic! Homosexuality is not "normal and harmless". It is blessed and exalted! It is all in all! As Mark Shea so often insists: Tolerance is not Enough. You. MUST. Approve. 

Seriously,

Liberal Democrat Leader Nick Clegg said that faith schools must not become "asylums of insular religious identity."
Ummm...I think that means that faith schools must not actually believe and teach the faith that they proclaim, lest their students (who were put there by parents who wanted them to learn in a faith-filled environment) assimilate the... er...faith. In other words, Mr. Clegg wants faith schools to be no different from non-faith schools. (Unless, of course, the faith is environmentalism. Then they can be as insular and asylum-like as they please.)  

insular: (adjective) disapproving
interested only in your own country or group and not willing to accept different or foreign ideas


Get. A. Life. (Tears and shivers optional)

Really.


A user named Mike wrote on the fan Web site "Naviblue" that he contemplated suicide after seeing the movie."Ever since I went to see 'Avatar' I have been depressed. Watching the wonderful world of Pandora and all the Na'vi made me want to be one of them. I can't stop thinking about all the things that happened in the film and all of the tears and shivers I got from it," Mike posted. "I even contemplate suicide thinking that if I do it I will be rebirthed in a world similar to Pandora and the everything is the same as in 'Avatar.' "

And another testimony, from Ivar Hill, a.k.a. "Eltu":

"When I woke up this morning after watching Avatar for the first time yesterday, the world seemed ... gray. It was like my whole life, everything I've done and worked for, lost its meaning," Hill wrote on the forum. "It just seems so ... meaningless. I still don't really see any reason to keep ... doing things at all. I live in a dying world."
Reached via e-mail in Sweden where he is studying game design, Hill, 17, explained that his feelings of despair made him desperately want to escape reality.
...which pretty much explains it. Like that guy in that Christmas movie said, "If they would rather die... they had better do it and decrease the surplus population."
The whole article at CNN.

No, OF COURSE I'm not advocating suicide, much less teen suicide. This article makes me feel really sad, and it makes me wonder: where are/were the parents of these children? How empty and shallow can your life be if you invest everything in a stupid movie? (I guess any number of Hollywood executives could answer that question.) Do I really need to preach about how the West has lost its spiritual foundation? The good news is, there really is a perfect paradise after this life, and there is a Way that leads there, no matter how much post-mods scoffs at the notion.

Offering a prayer for all Avatar orphans, wherever they may be...

Monday, January 11, 2010

Ordinary Time

Back to the grind. And back to being harangued about how eco-naughty we are. My favorite of these "New Year's revolutions" are "Observe an Eco-Sabbath" and "Tithe a Fixed Percentage of Your Income". I am quite relieved that environmentalism is finally coming out as a religion because it means I can sum up my position as that of a heretic.

Please note that the internet was not the first place I saw this article. No, I first read it in the print edition of my local Pennysaver, or "Smart Shopper", as it now styles itself. You know Smart Shopper, the 16- page advertisement that is printed on paper made from trees ripped from the womb of Gaia for the holy purpose of having ads for psychic fairs, bridal shows, and a bunch of other crap you don't need or want printed on it and then being stuffed in your mailbox every week even though you didn't ask for it? Yeah, that Smart Shopper.

On an unrelated note, I see the Pennysaver/ Smart Shopper no longer carries personal ads. I fear too many people who met their spouses through the Pennysaver ended up with a wedding cake like this one:


Friday, January 8, 2010

Uganda: witch doctors and child sacrifice

Chilling article at the BBC.

I found it courtesy of  FFOF. Here's Kathy's excerpt from the BBC article:
One witch-doctor led us to his secret shrine and said he had clients who regularly captured children and brought their blood and body parts to be consumed by spirits.


Meanwhile, a former witch-doctor who now campaigns to end child sacrifice confessed for the first time to having murdered about 70 people, including his own son.

The Ugandan government told us that human sacrifice is on the increase, and according to the head of the country's Anti-Human Sacrifice Taskforce the crime is directly linked to rising levels of development and prosperity, and an increasing belief that witchcraft can help people get rich quickly.
It's horrifying, backward and savage indeed. We do, however, have our own version of child sacrifice here in North America, but it's clinical and legal (until the umbilical cord is severed), and sometimes it's socially acceptable beyond that point (as when gassing a disabled child to death). We have an Anti-Human-Sacrifice Taskforce too, in the various facets of the pro-life and human dignity movements.

The only thing that's different, totally different, is that apparently some Africans have a primitive faith in black magic: they actually believe that sacrificing a child will help them financially. Pro-abortion North Americans, on the other hand, are modern and sophisticated: they believe that abortion is acceptable for...er...socio-economic reasons, or reasons of convenience ("I'm just not ready to be a mom"; "I don't wanna be tied down with a kid.") or cosmetic (don't wanna have stretch marks--yes, a swimsuit model went on record for saying that), or because the unborn child is the 'wrong' sex, or because their birth control failed, or just ...because. It's called "choice" and "unrestricted access." It's not black magic.  It's modern and sophisticated. I think.

NOT subjecting your children to pointless government bureacracy equals 'endangerment'

Cuz there aren't enough pedophiles, child-killlers, child-pornographers, abortionists, drunken/negligent parents, drug dealers and other assorted child-abusers for the cops to chase after.

Kathleen Gilbert, LifeSite News.

 Richard and Margie Cressy were arrested by the Montgomery County Sheriff on child endangerment charges for not registering their children, ages 8-14, at the local district. The Cressys submitted and won official approval for their homeschool curriculum for the 2009-2010 school year, but soon after were arrested for not having done so in previous years.
I can just envision the jailhouse scene from the upcoming made-for-TV movie:


SNAKE, A ONE-EYED BIKER
(sidles up to homeschooling dad; growls roughly): Hey man, what you in for?

CRESSY
(saucily pulls up collar on plaid short-sleeved dress shirt, spits tobacco juice across holding cell): None of your dang business, Buster.

SNAKE:
(grabbing Cressy): Why you son of a %#(@*&$!

CRACK DEALER (intervening, pushes Biker away): You don't wanna mess with that guy, Snake! He's bad news. (lowers voice) He failed to register his kids with the local homeschooling authority. 

SNAKE: Holy %#(@*! Guard, get me outta here!



And anyway, I am the only one horrified by this line: "submitted and won official approval for their homeschool curriculum"? It's a sorry pass when parents have to apply to the government for 'approval' of what they teach their children.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

I don't think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto.

National Cancer Institute Researcher Admits Abortion Breast Cancer Link
by  Thaddeus M. Baklinski, LifeSite News.


U.S. National Cancer Institute researcher Dr. Louise Brinton, who was the chief organizer of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshop in 2003 that persuaded women that it was "well established" that "abortion is not associated with increased breast cancer risk," has reversed her position and now admits that abortion and oral contraceptives raise breast cancer risks.

Cue violins…and pass the champagne.


What do Maude Barlow and Gollum have in common?

The ubiquitous Ms. Barlow in the Globe and Mail : [my comments in red]

As a new year and a new decade begin, it is time to accept an unpleasant reality: Canada's international reputation as a progressive middle power is gone. [woohoo!!] Instead, our country is increasingly seen as a human-rights-denying eco-outlaw [if bloody only! Maybe nixing the CHRC would clinch that...] that has lost its way and its special status as a standard bearer for a better world. This change is largely the doing of Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the ideology that has motivated him and his mentors for decades. [remind me to vote for that man!]

“Standard bearer for a better world”?? Ye gods, that might have come straight from the screenplay of  The Lord of the Rings Meets Monsters Incorporated.


To wit: “Mr. Harper's government continues to promote unlimited growth in the Alberta oil sands – Canada's Mordor.” Mwa ha ha! Does that make Mr. Harper Sauron? Where is the White Wizard Al Gore-dolph when we need him? What part in "Lord of The National Angst" does Ms. Barlow play?  Legolas? Gimli?  Or maybe Gollum. He’s the only non-hypocrite environmentalist that has ever existed: is not averse to  living naked on a rock and eating his food raw.

Barlow again: “I am personally ashamed of my country as I travel internationally.” (Cue violins) Boo hoo!  Most of us are too busy working for a living to “travel internationally.” And if you’re flying, Maude, I do hope it’s by Air Nazgul. (They scream something terrible, but except for the occasional unfortunate gastric emission, are fairly carbon neutral.)
image: http://www.lordotrings.com/tour/nazgul.asp

Further: Kathy Shaidle answers the old “Maple-Leaf-on-the-backpack thing.” Lawks, she makes me laugh. "Dear grey haired old farts: some of us are sick of your unexamined liberal wisdom and 1970s (upper) middle class cliches."



Thanks to SteynOnline for the link.

I am now looking forward to seeing this movie.

I was afraid it was just going to be predictable, heavy-handed, politically correct claptrap (like Pocahontas).

 With seven girls in the house, you can hardly avoid the latest (or indeed any) Disney princess movie.

Steven D. Graydanus's review of The Princess and the Frog.
Excerpt:


  There’s wishing on stars, magic and dreams coming true — but also emphasis on hard work and accomplishment, with a clear message that wishing on stars isn’t enough. There’s a handsome prince and a magical kiss, but here too it’s clear that merely hoping that someday your prince will come is inadequate as a life strategy.


There’s a villain with magical powers — but instead of Disneyfied magic, like Aladdin’s friendly genie, the film’s New Orleans voodoo is an occult world of terrifying powers and principalities in which the villain himself is at much at risk as anyone. It’s almost Disney’s most overtly Christian depiction of magic and evil at least since Sleeping Beauty, if not ever — though the waters are muddied by a benevolent, swamp-dwelling hoodoo mama in a sort of fairy-godmother role.

Moms and dads, read the whole thing. And bookmark Mr. Graydanus's site for future reference.

Margaret Wente on why airport security measures are so infernally stupid

I don't always agree with her, but I have liked her ever since she admitted the unthinkable (recycling is a waste of time, and Margaret Atwood's writing can be crappy.) 

The following quotation comes from The Globe and Mail.


Ours must be the first society in history that has tried to stop the killers by imposing collective punishment on ourselves.


How did we arrive at this absurd impasse? Because of our elaborately overdeveloped concern for human rights, combined with our towering fear of the hurt feelings of Muslims. If everyone is equal, then differential treatment must be racist, which is why we have decided that your grandma from Moose Jaw gets the same pat-down as a devout young male Muslim from Nigeria who did a recent stint at a religious school in Yemen.


The case of the underwear bomber certainly revealed lapses in the system. But there will always be lapses in the system. Trying to safeguard against the last thing a suicide killer tried – Surrender your liquids, Granny! – is merely theatre, because it's not the technique that needs to be intercepted, it's the killers.

Link from SteynOnline.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Cuz there aren't enough terrorists to worry about...

And you just never know when aliens might use their mind-powers on polar bears and attempt to invade the world via the North Pole. CIA spending resources to monitor Climate Change (TM)

“In times of peace and prosperity, this center would completely defy common sense. But today, only two weeks after a terrorist attempted to blow up a plane over our country, this center is absolutely ridiculous,” Barrasso said in a prepared statement. “The CIA’s resources should be focused on monitoring terrorists in caves – not polar bears on icebergs.”

This is kind of creepy

I know it's just some computer-generated database, but it still feels like I'm on some kind of ClimateChange Apostate list. As Mrs. Beazly so cleverly stated: "Computer algorithms are watching you."

AL GORE -ithms...get it? (or perhaps it's Al Gore Rythms...cuz he's so in tune with Nature and all)

Anyway, I have already publicly stated my opposition to the new faith in my Catholic Insight column from May , 2008: "Canadians embrace darkness."

Monday, January 4, 2010

Satirists will soon be completely unemployable.

It just keeps getting more surreal. New novel by (who else?) Margaret Atwood is being hailed as the new Green Bible.

 Ms. ATWOOD: Indeed, we now have the Green Bible among us, which I did not know when I was writing this book, which has tasteful linen covers, ecologically correct paper, the green parts in green. Introduction by Archbishop Tutu. And a list at the end of useful things you can do to be a more worthy green person.
I know how to be a worthy green person. Eat too many chocolate truffles and then go jump on a trampoline. It works every time.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Exercise, ye unfortunate fat ones!

That stirring exhortation comes from a Victorian publication whose title escapes me just now, but you will probably receive more or less the same message in your mailbox from  various health clubs and fitness equipment stores during this time of year. Don't be fooled by their advertising! No matter how much you exercise, if you follow the Canada Food Guide, you are doomed.

I think that article needs a rewrite to make its meaning a little clearer:

Canada's proposed new food guide will contribute to the country's obesity crisis, an Ottawa specialist in obesity medicine charges. Dr. Yerbez Spatflute, medical director of the Bow Vine Medical Institute in Ottawa calls the proposed new version of Canada's Food Guide "obesogenic". "That may not even be a word," he concedes, "But this is no time to argue etymology."

"Should anybody who is of average height and size follow Canada's Food Guide, there is a very, very good chance it will lead to weight gain," Dr. Spatflute said in an article published in the Canadian Meddlesome Association Journal today. "Canadians are simply mindless cows being herded about according to the contents of pamphlets issued by government agencies. And that's certainly just as it should be," Dr. Spateflute adds. "That's why it's so important that those government pamphlets be entirely accurate and safe. And edible, just in case."

The very public swipe at the food guide comes at a time when there are growing concerns about what and how much Canadians are eating and whether the government can slow what many say is an epidemic of obesity and related illnesses. "Who else's job should it be but the government's to make sure we don't get fat? I can't be bothered to stop eating when I'm full, and the majority of Canadians are not even capable of understanding that donuts are not a legume. From anecdotal evidence it seems most stay at home mothers live entirely on beer and popcorn. I believe there are better ways to eat than what the Canada Food Guide recommends...but how can we access the obscure solution to this mystery wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a taco?"

Obesity Acceptance and Prevention activist Artemis Phippin agrees. "The Canada Food Guide is a walking time bomb waiting to happen," he contends. From his home in Ontario, Mr. Phippin recounts how he struggled for years to eat 510 servings of fruits and vegetables per day, until he realized there was a little dash between the '5' and the '10'. "Our government failed me, and I want answers, "Mr. Phippin says. "Or at least bigger hyphens."

The controversy is likely to continue raging, as the final draft of the Canada Food Guide will be released March 15, or as local activists have renamed it, "The Ides of Starch". 

Saturday, January 2, 2010

DOH has at least one fan who is not a blood relation.

Duncan Veasey (you gotta scroll way down) comments in the Coffee House blog on how to improve The Spectator:

Time to give Notting Hill nobody a rest, cut back on "lifestyle," and soft and fluffy. Mrs Beazley and Mrs Pinkerton of 'Dumb Old Housewives' might replace Ms Johnson and Ms Standing. Bet they're cheaper than Steyn.
Yes, Duncan (and Spectator staff), Mrs. Pinkerton and Mrs. Beazly are cheaper than Steyn. But then, you get what you pay for. We will do anything that is not illegal, immoral, fattening, or inordinately demanding on family time. Call us.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Feminism, split-level homes, jet-wing lapels...

David Warren sums up the 70s. At last I feel vindicated for thinking it was the worst decade EVER. And I had to survive it without drugs.


And then we had Gerald Ford as president. That was silly enough; but then we had Jimmy Carter. And through almost all of that decade, a prime minister up here named Pierre Trudeau. Believe it or not, these men were taken seriously. We can only begin to see what a strange era that was, only begin to appreciate the flakiness into which public life had descended, at this distance.

That the 1970s also represented a kind of aesthetic nadir for Western Civilization we may see by examining contemporary magazines. Even with our current, deeply depressed standards, we instinctively flinch at their apparel. It was by extension a boring, pointless decade: I pity anyone who had to grow up in that era, and am inclined to understand their propensity to mind-altering drugs.